Washington, D.C. — In a dramatic legal escalation, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has moved to bypass India's government and serve legal summons directly to Indian billionaire Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar Adani via email and U.S. law firms.
This unprecedented step comes after 14 months of failed diplomatic attempts through official Indian channels, signaling a complete breakdown in international legal cooperation over alleged securities fraud and bribery schemes.
Key Facts
• The SEC filed a motion on January 21, 2026, seeking court permission to serve summons through email and U.S.-based legal counsel after diplomatic channels through India's Ministry of Law and Justice repeatedly failed
• The allegations center on a September 2021 bond offering worth $750 million, from which approximately $175 million came from U.S. investors who were allegedly misled about the company's anti-corruption safeguards
• Indian authorities have blocked service attempts since February 2025, citing technical objections about missing seals and signatures in April, then claiming the summons don't fall within permitted legal categories in December
The SEC's frustration is palpable after nearly a year of exchanges with India's Ministry of Law and Justice yielded absolutely no progress. What started as a routine international legal procedure through the Hague Convention in February 2025 turned into a diplomatic gridlock filled with excuses and technical objections that the SEC insists are baseless and irrelevant to international service procedures.
India first returned the SEC's service requests in April 2025, claiming the documents lacked proper seals and signatures. The SEC resubmitted in May 2025 with corrections, but received complete silence.
Follow-up attempts in April and September 2026 were similarly ignored, leaving the agency with no choice but to seek alternative legal routes.
In December 2025, Indian authorities raised what the SEC called an absurd new objection, arguing the summonses didn't fall within categories permitted under an internal SEC regulation. This argument defies the entire purpose of international legal service, which operates under bilateral treaties, not internal bureaucratic rules.
The SEC now wants to serve the Adanis through their top-tier U.S. legal teams: Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP for Gautam Adani, and Hecker Fink LLP for Sagar Adani. The agency argues the defendants are fully aware of the proceedings, have retained expensive U.S. counsel, and are actively coordinating their legal response, making email service constitutionally adequate notice.
Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 4(f)(3), which the SEC is invoking, courts can authorize service when international protocols fail and defendants have actual knowledge of proceedings. The Adanis clearly do—they've issued public denials and hired elite legal firepower to fight the charges.
The underlying allegations paint a serious picture: the SEC claims Gautam and Sagar Adani orchestrated a scheme involving substantial payments or promises to Indian government officials in exchange for favorable treatment. These bribes allegedly enabled the September 2021 bond offering, with the Adanis concealing the illegal scheme from American investors.
Parallel criminal charges were filed simultaneously in November 2024 by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York, alleging securities fraud conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy, and substantive securities fraud. The Adani Group has consistently rejected all allegations as baseless and vowed to pursue every available legal remedy.
This case represents an extraordinary moment in U.S.-India legal relations. The SEC's decision to bypass traditional diplomatic channels reveals severe cracks in international legal cooperation and raises questions about whether Indian authorities are deliberately obstructing justice or simply mismanaging the process.
Either way, American investors who purchased bonds under allegedly false pretenses deserve answers.
The federal court will now decide whether email service is appropriate, likely within weeks. If approved, the Adanis' U.S. legal teams will receive formal notice, forcing them to either respond to the SEC's civil claims or risk default judgments.
This won't be the end of the story—it's merely the beginning of a complex legal battle that could reshape how international enforcement works when diplomatic channels fail.
Do You Know?
The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extra-Judicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, established in 1965, was created specifically to streamline legal service between countries and reduce exactly these kinds of delays. Yet it often takes 6-12 months or longer to serve documents through this treaty, giving defendants and foreign governments ample opportunity to obstruct the process.
Key Terms
• Hague Convention: An international treaty that establishes procedures for serving legal documents between countries, meant to facilitate cross-border legal cases
• Securities Fraud: Deception involving financial investments, where companies mislead investors about material facts needed to make informed decisions
• Bribery Scheme: Illegal payments or promises made to government officials to secure favorable treatment, considered a serious federal crime in the United States
• Material Misrepresentation: False or misleading statements about important facts that would significantly influence an investor's decision to buy or sell securities
• Rule 4(f)(3): A U.S. federal procedural rule allowing courts to authorize alternative methods of serving legal documents when traditional international procedures have failed
Image from Wikimedia Commons