University of California Rejects Ethnic Studies Admission Mandate

Written on 04/29/2025
Asia91 Team


Oakland, CA In a significant decision on April 23, 2025, the University of California (UC) Faculty Assembly voted against a proposal to make a semester-long ethnic studies course a mandatory requirement for freshman admissions. The proposal, known as "Area H," was defeated with 29 votes against, 12 in favor, and 12 abstentions. This move has ignited discussions about diversity, inclusion, and the role of ethnic studies in higher education.

 

Key Facts:

  • The proposal aimed to add a one-semester ethnic studies course to UC's admissions requirements.

 

  • The Faculty Assembly vote concluded with 29 opposing, 12 supporting, and 12 abstaining.

 

  • Implementation concerns included a projected annual cost of $276 million and potential disparities affecting approximately 20,000 students annually.

 

The "Area H" proposal was initially introduced in 2020 and sought to incorporate ethnic studies into the UC admissions criteria. Proponents argued that such a requirement would promote a more inclusive and comprehensive educational experience. However, the proposal faced criticism over its content and potential implications.

 

Opponents raised concerns about the proposal's ideological leanings, particularly regarding its portrayal of certain groups and geopolitical issues. Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, Executive Director of the AMCHA Initiative, criticized the proposal for promoting a narrow ideological framework and for its stance on Zionism and related topics. She stated that the proposal "promoted a narrow ideological framework that casts Jews as 'privileged' oppressors and portrays Zionism... as inherently evil."

 

Financial implications also played a significant role in the decision. The California Department of Education estimated that implementing the requirement would cost approximately $276 million annually, necessitating the hiring of over 1,600 new teachers and additional resources. Concerns were raised that underfunded school districts might struggle to meet these requirements, potentially disadvantaging students from these areas.

 

While the UC system decided against making ethnic studies a mandatory admissions requirement, California state law still mandates that high schools offer ethnic studies courses starting in the fall of 2025, with the subject becoming a graduation requirement by the 2029–2030 academic year. However, this mandate's implementation is contingent upon the allocation of necessary funding by the state legislature.

 

 

"This initiative is sponsored by an extreme far-left faculty activist group, which would make their perverted version of 'ethnic studies'... a mandatory course for all high school students aspiring to attend UC," stated S.A.F.E Campus, a nonprofit focusing on combating antisemitism on campuses.

 

The UC Faculty Assembly's decision reflects the complexities of integrating ethnic studies into university admissions. While the move has been applauded by some for preserving academic neutrality, others view it as a missed opportunity to advance diversity and inclusion. As California continues to navigate the implementation of ethnic studies in high schools, the debate over its role in higher education remains a contentious and evolving issue.

 

Do You Know?

According to a UC Senate review, implementing the ethnic studies requirement would necessitate hiring over 1,600 new teachers, each with an average salary of $83,000, plus benefits. This significant investment underscores the challenges of integrating new curricular requirements on a large scale. 

 

Key Terms:

  • Ethnic Studies: An interdisciplinary academic field that examines the social, cultural, and historical experiences of ethnic groups, focusing on issues of race, identity, and social justice.

  • Area H: The proposed addition to UC's admissions requirements mandating a semester-long ethnic studies course for incoming freshmen.

  • UC Faculty Assembly: A governing body within the University of California system responsible for deliberating and voting on academic policies and proposals.

  • AMCHA Initiative: A nonprofit organization dedicated to combating antisemitism on college campuses and promoting academic integrity.

  • S.A.F.E Campus: A nonprofit organization focused on addressing antisemitism and ensuring safe environments on college campuses.